|
ANGLES OF JEWISH INFLUENCE
The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews appear, says
Theodor Herzl, because they bring it with them. It is not
their numbers that create the Question, for there is in
almost every country a larger number of other aliens than of
Jews. It is not their much-boasted ability, for it is now
coming to be understood that, give the Jew an equal start
and hold him to the rules of the game, and he is not smarter
than anyone else; indeed, in one great class of Jews the
zeal is quenched when opportunity for intrigue is removed.
The Jewish Question is not the number of Jews who reside
here, not in the American's jealousy of the Jew's success,
certainly not in any objection to the Jew's Mosaic religion;
it is in something else, and that something else is the fact
of Jewish influence on the life of the country where Jews
dwell; in the United States it is the Jewish influence
on American life.
That the Jews exert an influence, they themselves loudly
proclaim. The Jews claim, indeed, that the fundamentals of
the United States are Jewish and not Christian, and that the
entire history of this country should be re-written to make
proper acknowledgement of the prior glory due to Judah. If
the question of influence rested entirely on the Jewish
claim, there would be no occasion for doubt; they claim it
all. But it is kindness to hold them to the facts; it is
also more clearly explanatory of the conditions in our
country.
If they insist that they "gave us our Bible" and "gave us
our God" and "gave us our religion," as they do over and
over again with nauseating superciliousness throughout all
their polemic publications -- not a single one of these
claims being true -- they must not grow impatient and
profane while we complete the list of the real influences
they have set at work in American life.
It is not the Jewish people but the Jewish idea,
and the people only as vehicles of the idea, that is the
point at issue. In this investigation of the Jewish
Question, it is Jewish influence and the Jewish Idea that
are being discovered and defined.
The Jews are propagandists. This was originally their
mission. But they were to propagate the central tenet of
their religion. This they failed to do. By failing in this
they, according to their own Scriptures, failed everywhere
They are now without a mission of blessing. Few of their
leaders even claim a spiritual mission. But the mission idea
is still with them in a degenerate form; it represents the
grossest materialism of the day; it has become a means of
sordid acquisition instead of a channel of service.
LABOR AND JEWRY
The essence of the Jewish Idea in its influence on the
labor world is the same as in all other departments --
the destruction of real values in favor of fictitious
values. The Jewish philosophy of money is not to "make
money," but to "get money." The distinction between these
two is fundamental. That explains Jews being "financiers"
instead of "captains of industry." It is the difference
between "getting" and "making."
The creative, constructive type of mind has an affection for
the thing it is doing. The non-Jewish worker formerly chose
the work he liked best. He did not change employment easily,
because there was a bond between him and the kind of work he
had chosen. Nothing else was so attractive to him. He would
rather draw a little less money and do what he liked to do,
than a little more and do what irked him. The "maker" is
always thus influenced by his liking.
Not so the "getter." It doesn't matter what he does, so long
as the income is satisfactory. He has no illusions,
sentiments or affections on the side of work. It is the
"geld" that counts. He has no attachment for the things he
makes, for he doesn't make any; he deals in the things which
other men make and regards them solely on the side of their
money-making value. "The joy of creative labor" is nothing
to him, not even an intelligible saying.
Now, previous to the advent of Jewish socialistic and
subversive ideas, the predominant thought in the labor world
was to "make" things and thus "make" money. There was a
pride among mechanics. Men who made things were a sturdy,
honest race because they dealt with ideas of skill and
quality, and their very characters were formed by the
satisfaction of having performed useful functions in
society. They were the Makers. And society was solid so long
as they were solid. Men made shoes as exhibitions of their
skill. Farmers raised crops for the inherent love of crops,
not with reference to far-off money-markets. Everywhere THE
JOB was the main thing and the rest was incidental.
The only way to break down this strong safeguard of society
-- a creative laboring class of sturdy character -- was to
sow other ideas among it; and the most dangerous of all the
ideas sown was that which substituted "get" for "make."
With the required manipulation of the money and food
markets, enough pressure could be brought to bear on the
ultimate consumers to give point to the idea of "get," and
it was not long before the internal relations of American
business were totally upset, with Jews at the head of the
banking system, and Jews at the head of both the
conservative and radical elements of the Labor Movement,
and, most potent of all, the Jewish Idea sowed through the
minds of workingmen. What Idea? The idea of "get" instead of
"make."
The idea of "get" is a vicious, anti-social and destructive
idea when held alone; but when held in company with "make"
and as second in importance, it is legitimate and
constructive. As soon as a man or a class is inoculated with
the strictly Jewish idea of "getting" -- ("getting mine";
"getting while the getting is good"; honestly if you can,
dishonestly if you must -- but get it" -- all of which are
notes of this treasonable philosophy), the very cement of
Duncan society loses its adhesiveness and begins to crumble.
The great myth and fiction of Money has been forced into the
place of real things, and the second step of the drama can
thus be opened up.
Jewish influence on the thought of the working-men of the
United States, as well as on the thought of business and
professional men, has been bad, thoroughly bad. This is not
manifested in a division between "capital" and "labor," for
there are no such separate elements; there is only the
executive and operating departments of American business.
The real division is between the Jewish Idea of "get" and
the Anglo-Saxon idea of "make," and at the present time the
Jewish idea has been successful enough to have caused an
upset.
All over the United States, in many branches of trade,
Communist colleges are maintained, officered and taught by
Jews. These so-called colleges exist in Chicago, Detroit,
Cleveland, Rochester, Pittsburgh, New York, Philadelphia and
other cities, the whole intent being to put all American
labor on a "get" basis, which must prove the economic
damnation of the country. That is the end sought, as in
Russia.
Until Jews can show that the infiltration of foreign Jews
and the Jewish Idea into the American labor movement has
made for the betterment in character and estate, in
citizenship and economic statesmanship, the charge of being
an alien, destructive and treasonable influence will have to
stand.
THE CHURCHES AND JEWRY
The last place the uninstructed observer would look for
traces of Jewish influence is in the Christian Church, yet
if he fails to look there he will miss much. If the
libraries of our theological seminaries were equipped with
complete files of Jewish literary effort during recent
decades, and if the theological students were required to
read these Jewish utterances there would be less silly talk
and fewer "easy marks" for Jewish propaganda in the American
pulpit. For the next 25 years every theological seminary
should support a chair for the study of Modern Jewish
influence and the Protocols. The fiction, that the Jews are
an Old Testament people faithful to the Mosaic Law, would
then be exploded, and timid Christians would no longer
superstitiously hesitate to speak the truth about them
because of that sadly misinterpreted text: "I will bless
them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee."
There is a mission for the pulpit to liberate the Church
from what the New Testament Scriptures call "the fear of the
Jews." The pulpit has also the mission of liberating the
Church from the error that Judah and Israel are synonymous.
The reading of the Scriptures which confuse the tribe of
Judah with Israel, and which interpret every mention of
Israel as signifying the Jews, is at the root of more than
one-half the confusion and division traceable in Christian
doctrinal statements.
The Jews are NOT "The Chosen People," though practically the
entire Church has succumbed to the propaganda which declares
them to be so. The Jewish tinge of thought has of late years
overspread many Christian statements, and the uninstructed
clergy have proved more and more amenable to Jewish
suggestion.
The flaccid condition of the Church, so much deplored by
spokesmen who had regard for her inner life, was brought
about not by "science," not by "scholarship," not by the
"increase of light and learning"-- for none of these things
are antagonistic even to incomplete statements of truth --
but by Jewish-German Higher Criticism. The
defenders of the faith have fought long and valiantly
against the inroads made by the so-called Higher Criticism,
but were sadly incapacitated in their defense, because they
did not see that its origin and purpose were Jewish. It was
not Christian; it was not German; it was Jewish.
It is perfectly in keeping with the Jewish World Program
that this destructive influence should be sent out under
Jewish auspices, and it is perfectly in keeping with
non-Jewish trustfulness to accept the thing without looking
at its source. The Church is now victim of a second attack
against her, in the rampant Socialism and Sovietism that
have been thrust upon her in the name of flabby and unmoral
theories of "brotherhood" and in an appeal to her
"fairness." The church has been made to believe that she is
a forum for discussion and not a high place for
annunciation.
Jews have actually invaded, in person and in program,
hundreds of American churches, with their subversive and
impossible social ideals, and at last became so cocksure of
their domination of the situation that they were met with
the inevitable check.
Clergymen ought to know that seven-eights of the economic
mush they speak from the pulpit is prepared by Jewish
professors of political economy and revolutionary leaders.
They should be informed that economic thought has been so
completely Judaized by means of a deliberate and masterly
plan of camouflaged propaganda, that the mass-thought of the
crowd (which is the thought mostly echoed in "popular"
pulpits and editorials) is more Jewish than Jewry itself
holds.
The Jew has got hold of the Church in doctrine, in
liberalism, so-called, and in the feverish and feeble
sociological diversions of many classes. If there is any
place where a straight study of the Jewish Question should
be made it is in the modern Church which is unconsciously
giving allegiance to a mass of Jewish propaganda. It is not
reaction that is counselled here; it is progress along
constructive paths, the paths of our forefathers, the
Anglo-Saxons, who have to this day been the World-Builders,
the Makers of cities and commerce and continents; and not
the Jews who have never been builders or pioneers, who have
never peopled the wilderness, but who move in upon the
labors of other men. They are not to be blamed for not being
Builders or Pioneers, perhaps; they are to be blamed for
claiming all the rights of pioneers; but even then, perhaps,
their blame ought not to be so great as the blame that rests
upon the sons of the Anglo-Saxons for rejecting the
straightforward Building of their fathers, and taking up
with the doubtful ideas of Judah.
JEWRY IN SCHOOLS AND
COLLEGES
Colleges are being constantly invaded by the Jewish Idea.
The sons of the Anglo-Saxons are being attacked in their
very heredity. The sons of the Builders, the Makers, are
being subverted to the philosophy of the destroyers. Young
men in the first exhilarating months of intellectual freedom
are being seized with promissory doctrines, the source and
consequences of which they do not see. There is a natural
rebelliousness of youth, which promises progress; there is a
natural venturesomeness to play free with ancient faiths;
both of which are ebullitions of the spirit and significance
of dawning mental virility. It is during the periods when
these adolescent expansions are in process that the youth is
captured by influences which deliberately lie in wait for
him at the colleges. True, in after years a large proportion
come to their senses sufficiently to be able "to sit on the
fence and see themselves go by," and they come back to
sanity. They find that "freelove" doctrines make
exhilarating club topics, but that the Family -- the
old-fashioned loyalty of one man and one woman to each other
and their children -- is the basis not only of society, but
of all personal character and progress. They find that
Revolution, while a delightful subject for fiery debates and
an excellent stimulant to the feeling of superman-likeness,
is nevertheless not the process of progress.
The trouble with the colleges has progressed along precisely
the same lines that have been described in connection with
the churches. First, Jewish higher criticism in the
destruction of young men's sense of respect for the ancient
foundations; second, Jewish revolutionary social doctrines.
The two always go together. They cannot live apart. They are
the fulfillment of the Protocol's program to split
non-Jewish society by means of ideas.
It is idle to attack the "radicalism" of college student --
these are the qualities of immaturity. But it is not idle to
show that social radicalism ("radicalism" being a very good
word very sadly misused) comes from a Jewish source. The
central group of Red philosophers in every university is a
Jewish group, with often enough a "Gentile front" in the
shape of a deluded professor. Some of these professors
are in the pay of outside Red organizations. There are
Intercollegiate Socialist Societies, swarming with Jews and
Jewish influences, and toting Jewish professors around the
country, addressing fraternities under the patronage of the
best civic and university auspices. Student lecture courses
are fine pasture for this propaganda, the purpose being to
give the students the thrill of believing that they are
taking part in the beginning of a new great movement,
comparable to the winning of Independence.
The revolutionary forces which head up in Jewry rely very
heavily on the respectability which is given their movement
by the adhesion of students and a few professors. It was so
in Russia -- everyone knows what the name "student"
eventually came to signify in that country. The Jewish
Chautauqua, which works almost exclusively in colleges and
universities, together with Bolshevism in art, science,
religion, economics and sociology, are driving straight
through the Anglo-Saxon traditions and landmarks of our race
of students. These are ably assisted by professors and
clergymen whose thinking has been dislocated and poisoned by
Jewish subversive influences in theology and sociology.
WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT?
Simply identify the source and nature of the influence which
has overrun our schools and universities. Let the students
know that their choice is between the Anglo-Saxons and the
Tribe of Judah. Let the students decide, in making up their
allegiance, whether they will follow the Builders or those
who seek to tear down. It is not a case for argument. The
only absolute antidote to the Jewish influence is to call
college students back to a pride of race.
We often speak of the Fathers as if they were the few who
happened to affix their signatures to a great document which
marked a new era of liberty. The Fathers of our nation were
the men of the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic race. The men who came
from Europe with civilization in their blood and in their
destiny. The men who crossed the Atlantic and set up
civilization on a bleak and rock-bound coast; the men who
drove north to Alaska and west to California; the men who
opened up the tropics and subdued the arctics; the men who
mastered the African veldt; the men who peopled Australia
and seized the gates of the world at Suez, Gibraltar and
Panama; men who have given form to every government and a
livelihood to every people and an ideal to every century.
They got neither their God nor their religion from Judah,
nor yet their speech nor their creative genius -- they are
the Ruling People. Chosen throughout the centuries to Master
the world, by building it ever better and better, and not by
breaking it down.
Into the camp of this race, among the sons of the rulers,
comes a people that has no civilization to point to, no
aspiring religion, no universal speech, no great achievement
in any realm but the realm of "get," cast out of every land
that gave them hospitality, and these people endeavor to
tell the Sons of the Saxons what is needed to make the world
what it ought to be!
If our sons follow this counsel of dark rebellion and
destruction, it is because they do not know whose sons they
are, of what race they are the scions. Let there be free
speech to the limit in our universities and free intercourse
of ideas, but let Jewish thoughts be labeled Jewish, and let
our sons know the racial secret.
NAME THE ENEMY!
The warning has already gone out through the colleges. The
system of Jewish procedure is already fully known. How
simple it is! First, you secularize the public schools --
"secularize" is the precise word the Jews use for the
process. You prepare the mind of the public school child by
enforcing the rule that no mention shall ever be made to
indicate that culture or patriotism is in any way connected
with the deeper principles of the Anglo-Saxon religion. Keep
it out, every sight and sound of it! Keep out also every
word that will aid any child to identify the Jewish race.
Then, when you have thus prepared the soil, you can go into
the universities and colleges and enter upon the double
program of pouring contempt on all the AngloSaxon landmarks,
at the same time filling the void with Jewish revolutionary
ideas.
The influence of the common people is driven out of the
schools, where common people's influence can go; but Jewish
influence is allowed to run rampant in the higher
institutions where the common people's influence cannot go.
Secularize the schools, and you can then Judaize the
universities.
This is the "liberalism" which Jewish spokesmen so much
applaud. In labor unions, in churches, in universities, it
has tainted the principles of work, faith and society. The
proof of it is written thickly over all Jewish activities
and utterances. It is in exerting these very influences that
Jewry convinces itself that it is fulfilling its "mission"
to the world.
The capitalism attacked is non-Jewish capitalism; the
orthodoxy attacked is Christian orthodoxy; the society
attacked is the Anglo-Saxon form of society; all of which by
their destruction would redound to the glory of Judaism.
The list could be extended -- the influence of the Jewish
idea on Anglo-Saxon sports and pleasure, on the Anglo-Saxon
idea of patriotism, on the Anglo-Saxon conception of the
learned professions; the influence of the Jewish idea runs
down through every department of life.
"Well," one very badly deluded American editor, wrapped up
in Jewish advertising contracts, was heard to say, "if the
Jews can get away with it, then they have a right to." It is
a variant of the "answer" of Jewish origin, which runs thus:
"How can a paltry 3 million run the 100 million of the rest
of us? Nonsense!"
Yes, let it be agreed; if the Jewish idea is the stronger,
if the Jewish ability is the greater, let them conquer; let
Anglo-Saxon principles and power go down in ruins before the
Tribe of Judah. But first let the two ideas struggle under
their own banners; let it be a fair struggle.
It is not a fair fight when in the movies, in the schools,
in the Judaized churches, in the universities, the
Anglo-Saxon idea is kept away from the Anglo-Saxons on the
plea that it is "sectarian" or "clannish" or "obsolete" or
something else, say, reaction.
It is not a fair fight when Jewish ideas are offered as
AngloSaxon ideas, because offered under Anglo-Saxon
auspices. Let the heritage of our Anglo-Saxon fathers have
free course among their Anglo-Saxon sons, and the Jewish
idea can never triumph over it, in the university forum or
in the marts of trade. The Jewish idea never triumphs until
first the people over whom it triumphs are denied the
nurture of their native culture.
Judah has begun the struggle. Judah has made the invasion.
Let it come. Let no man fear it. But let every a man insist
that the fight be fair. Let college students and leaders of
thought know that the objective is the regnancy of the ideas
and the race that have built all the civilization we see and
that promises all the civilization of the future; let them
also know that the attacking force is Jewish.
That is all that will be necessary. It is against this that
the Jews protest. "You must not identify us," they say, "You
must not use the term 'Jew'." Why? Because unless the Jewish
idea can creep in under the assumption of other than Jewish
origin, it is doomed. Anglo-Saxon ideas dare proclaim
themselves and their origin. A proper proclamation is all
that is necessary today. Compel every invading idea to run
up its flag!
The Fourth Protocol
--
"It is for this
reason that we must undermine faith, eradicate from the
minds of the Gentiles the very principles of God and Soul,
and replace these conceptions by mathematical calculations
and material desires." |
