|
American Jews sympathetic to
Israel dominate key positions in all areas of our government
where decisions are made regarding the Middle East. This
being the case, is there any hope of ever changing U.S.
policy? President Bill Clinton as well as most members of
Congress support Israel—and they know why. U.S. Jews
sympathetic to Israel donate lavishly to their campaign
coffers.
The answer to achieving
an even-handed Middle East policy might lie elsewhere—among
those who support Israel but don’t really know why.. This
group is the vast majority of Americans. They are
well-meaning, fair-minded Christians who feel bonded to
Israel—and Zionism—often from atavistic feelings, in some
cases dating from childhood.
I am one of those. I
grew up listening to stories of a mystical, allegorical,
spiritual Israel. This was before a modern political entity
with the same name appeared on our maps. I attended Sunday
School and watched an instructor draw down window-type
shades to show maps of the Holy Land. I imbibed stories of a
Good and Chosen people who fought against their Bad
“unChosen” enemies..
In my early 20s, I
began traveling the world, earning my living as a writer. I
came to the subject of the Middle East rather late in my
career. I was sadly lacking in knowledge regarding the area.
About all I knew was what I had learned in Sunday School.
And typical of many
U.S. Christians, I somehow considered a modern state created
in 1948 as a homeland for Jews persecuted under the Nazis as
a replica of the spiritual, mystical Israel I heard about as
a child. When in 1979 I initially went to Jerusalem, I
planned to write about the three great monotheistic
religions and leave out politics. “Not write about
politics?” scoffed one Palestinian, smoking a water pipe in
the Old Walled City. “We eat politics, morning, noon and
night!”
As I would learn, the
politics is about land, and the co-claimants to that land:
the indigenous Palestinians who have lived there for 2,000
years and the Jews who started arriving in large numbers
after the Second World War. By living among Israeli Jews as
well as Palestinian Christians and Muslims, I saw, heard,
smelled, experienced the police state tactics Israelis use
against Palestinians.
My research led to a
book entitled Journey to Jerusalem. My journey not only was
enlightening to me as regards Israel, but also I came to a
deeper, and sadder, understanding of my own country. I say
sadder understanding because I began to see that, in Middle
East politics, we the people are not making the decisions,
but rather that supporters of Israel are doing so. And
typical of most Americans, I tended to think the U.S. media
was “free” to print news impartially.
“It shouldn’t be published. It’s anti-Israel. ”
In the late 1970s, when
I first went to Jerusalem, I was unaware that editors could
and would classify “news” depending on who was doing what to
whom. On my initial visit to Israel-Palestine, I had
interviewed dozens of young Palestinian men. About one in
four related stories of torture.
Israeli police had come in
the night, dragged them from their beds and placed hoods
over their heads. Then in jails the Israelis had kept them
in isolation, besieged them with loud, incessant noises,
hung them upside down and had sadistically mutilated their
genitals. I had not read such stories in the U.S. media.
Wasn’t it news? Obviously, I naively thought, U.S. editors
simply didn’t know it was happening.
On a trip to
Washington, DC, I hand-delivered a letter to Frank
Mankiewicz, then head of the public radio station WETA. I
explained I had taped interviews with Palestinians who had
been brutally tortured. And I’d make them available to him.
I got no reply. I made several phone calls. Eventually I was
put through to a public relations person, a Ms. Cohen, who
said my letter had been lost. I wrote again. In time I began
to realize what I hadn’t known: had it been Jews who were
strung up and tortured, it would be news. But interviews
with tortured Arabs were “lost” at WETA.
The process of getting my book Journey to Jerusalem
published also was a learning experience. Bill Griffin, who
signed a contract with me on behalf of MacMillan Publishing
Company, was a former Roman Catholic priest. He assured me
that no one other than himself would edit the book. As I
researched the book, making several trips to Israel and
Palestine, I met frequently with Griffin, showing him sample
chapters. “Terrific,” he said of my material.
The day the book was
scheduled to be published, I went to visit MacMillan’s.
Checking in at a reception desk, I spotted Griffin across a
room, cleaning out his desk. His secretary Margie came to
greet me. In tears, she whispered for me to meet her in the
ladies room. When we were alone, she confided, “He’s been
fired.” She indicated it was because he had signed a
contract for a book that was sympathetic to Palestinians.
Griffin, she said, had no time to see me.
Later, I met with
another MacMillan official, William Curry. “I was told to
take your manuscript to the Israeli Embassy, to let them
read it for mistakes,” he told me. “They were not pleased.
They asked me, `You are not going to publish this book, are
you?’ I asked, `Were there mistakes?’ `Not mistakes as such.
But it shouldn’t be published. It’s anti-Israel. ‘”
Somehow, despite
obstacles to prevent it, the presses had started rolling.
After its publication in 1980, I was invited to speak in a
number of churches. Christians generally reacted with
disbelief. Back then, there was little or no coverage of
Israeli land confiscation, demolition of Palestinian homes,
wan ton arrests and torture of Palestinian civilians.
The Same Question
Speaking of these injustices, I invariably heard the same
question, “How come I didn’t know this?” Or someone might
ask, “But I haven’t read about that in my newspaper.” To
these church audiences, I related my own learning
experience, that of seeing hordes of U.S. correspondents
covering a relatively tiny state. I pointed out that I had
not seen so many reporters in world capitals such as
Beijing, Moscow, London, Tokyo, Paris. Why, I asked, did a
small state with a 1980 population of only four million
warrant more reporters than China, with a billion people?
I also linked this
query with my findings that The New York Times, The Wall
Street Journal, The Washington Post—and most of our nation’s
print media—are owned and/or controlled by Jews supportive
of Israel. It was for this reason, I deduced, that they sent
so many reporters to cover Israel—and to do so largely from
the Israeli point of view.
My learning experiences also included coming to realize how
easily I could lose a Jewish friend if I criticized the
Jewish state. I could with impunity criticize France,
England, Russia, even the United States. And any aspect of
life in America. But not the Jewish state. I lost more
Jewish friends than one after the publication of Journey to
Jerusalem—all sad losses for me and one, perhaps, saddest of
all.
In the 1960s and 1970s,
before going to the Middle East, I had
written about the plight of blacks in a book entitled Soul
Sister, and the plight of American Indians in a book
entitled Bessie Yellowhair, and the problems endured by
undocumented workers crossing from Mexico in The Illegals.
These books had come to the attention of the “mother” of The
New York Times, Mrs. Arthur Hays Sulzberger.
Her father had started the newspaper, then her husband ran
it, and in the years that I knew her, her son was the
publisher. She invited me to her fashionable apartment on
Fifth Avenue for lunches and dinner parties. And, on many
occasions, I was a weekend guest at her Greenwich, Conn.
home.
She was liberal-minded
and praised my efforts to speak for the underdog, even going
so far in one letter to say, “You are the most remarkable
woman I ever knew.” I had little concept that from being
buoyed so high I could be dropped so suddenly when I
discovered—from her point of view—the “wrong” underdog.
As it happened, I was a
weekend guest in her spacious Connecticut home when she read
bound galleys of Journey to Jerusalem. As I was leaving, she
handed the galleys back with a saddened look: “My dear, have
you forgotten the Holocaust?” She felt that what happened in
Nazi Germany to Jews several decades earlier should silence
any criticism of the Jewish state. She could focus on a
holocaust of Jews while negating a modern day holocaust of
Palestinians.
I realized, quite
painfully, that our friendship was ending. Iphigene
Sulzberger had not only invited me to her home to meet her
famous friends but, also at her suggestion, The Times had
requested articles. I wrote op-ed articles on various
subjects including American blacks, American Indians as well
as undocumented workers. Since Mrs. Sulzberger and other
Jewish officials at the Times highly praised my efforts to
help these groups of oppressed peoples, the dichotomy became
apparent: most “liberal” U.S. Jews stand on the side of all
poor and oppressed peoples save one—the Palestinians.
How handily these liberal Jewish opinion-molders tend to
diminish the Palestinians, to make them invisible, or to
categorize them all as “terrorists. ”
Interestingly, Iphigene
Sulzberger had talked to me a great deal about her father,
Adolph S. Ochs. She told me that he was not one of the early
Zionists. He had not favored the creation of a Jewish state.
Yet, increasingly, American Jews have fallen victim to
Zionism, a nationalistic movement that passes for many as a
religion. While the ethical instructions of all great
religions—including the teachings of Moses, Muhammad and
Christ—stress that all human beings are equal, militant
Zionists take the position that the killing of a non-Jew
does not count.
Over five decades now,
Zionists have killed Palestinians with impunity. And in the
1996 shelling of a U.N. base in Qana, Lebanon, the Israelis
killed more than 100 civilians sheltered there. As an
Israeli journalist, Arieh Shavit, explains of the massacre,
“We believe with absolute certitude that right now, with the
White House in our hands, the Senate in our hands and The
New York Times in our hands, the lives of others do not
count the same way as our own.”
Israelis today,
explains the anti-Zionist Jew Israel Shahak, “are not basing
their religion on the ethics of justice. They do not accept
the Old Testament as it is written. Rather, religious Jews
turn to the Talmud. For them, the Talmudic Jewish laws
become `the Bible.’ And the Talmud teaches that a Jew can
kill a non-Jew with impunity.”
In the teachings of Christ, there was a break from such
Talmudic teachings. He sought to heal the wounded, to
comfort the downtrodden.
The danger, of course, for U.S. Christians is that having
made an icon of Israel, we fall into a trap of condoning
whatever Israel does—even wanton murder—as orchestrated by
God.
Yet, I am not alone in
suggesting that the churches in the United States represent
the last major organized support for Palestinian rights.
This imperative is due in part to our historic links to the
Land of Christ and in part to the moral issues involved with
having our tax dollars fund Israeli-government- approved
violations of human rights.
While Israel and its
dedicated U.S. Jewish supporters know they have the
president and most of Congress in their hands, they worry
about grassroots America—the well-meaning Christians who
care for justice. Thus far, most Christians were unaware of
what it was they didn’t know about Israel. They were
indoctrinated by U.S. supporters of Israel in their own
country and when they traveled to the Land of Christ most
all did so under Israeli sponsorship. That being the case,
it was unlikely a Christian ever met a Palestinian or
learned what caused the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
This is gradually
changing, however. And this change disturbs the Israelis. As
an example, delegates attending a Christian Sabeel
conference in Bethlehem earlier this year said they were
harassed by Israeli security at the Tel Aviv airport.
“They asked us,” said
one delegate, “`Why did you use a Palestinian travel agency?
Why didn’t you use an Israeli agency?’” The interrogation
was so extensive and hostile that Sabeel leaders called a
special session to brief the delegates on how to handle the
harassment. Obviously, said one delegate, “The Israelis have
a policy to discourage us from visiting the Holy Land except
under their sponsorship. They don’t want Christians to start
learning all they have never known about Israel.”
|