|
These are
the natural boundaries of the Syrian homeland which has housed
the elements of the Syrian nation and provided them with the
basis of their lives and the opportunity of contact and
collision, then mixture and fusion which resulted in the
formation of the distinct character of the Syrian nation. The
Chaldeans and Assyrians were alive to the internal unity and
integrity of this country and sought to unify it politically,
interested as they were in the idea of the territorial state.
Similarly, all the other people who inhabited this region were
conscious of the internal unity of the country and sought to
build up confederations between decentralized governments to
avoid internal dissension and for protection from external
incursions.
The secret
of Syria's persistence as a distinct nation despite the numerous
invasions to which it succumbed, lies in the geographic unity of
its homeland. It was this geographic unity that ensured the
political unity of this country even in environment in which the
Syrian nation evolved. It has distinct natural boundaries and
extends from the Taurus range in the northwest and the Zagros
mountains in the northeast to the Suez canal and the Red Sea in
the south and includes the Sinai peninsula and the gulf of
Aqaba, and from the Syrian sea in the west, including the island
of Cyprus, to the arch of the Arabian desert and the Persian
gulf in the east. (This region is also known as the Syrian
Fertile Crescent).
These are
the natural boundaries of the Syrian homeland which has housed
the elements of the Syrian nation and provided them with the
basis of their lives and the opportunity of contact and
collision, then mixture and fusion which resulted in the
formation of the distinct character of the Syrian nation. The
Chaldeans and Assyrians were alive to the internal unity and
integrity of this country and sought to unify it politically,
interested as they were in the idea of the territorial state.
Similarly, all the other people who inhabited this region were
conscious of the internal unity of the country and sought to
build up confederations between decentralized governments to
avoid internal dissension and for protection from external
incursions.
The secret
of Syria's persistence as a distinct nation despite the numerous
invasions to which it succumbed, lies in the geographic unity of
its homeland. It was this geographic unity that ensured the
political unity of this country even in ancient times when it
was still divided among the Canaanites, the Arameans, the
Hittites, the Amorites, the Assyrians, and the Chaldeans, a
political unity which manifested itself in the formation of
alliances in the face of threats from Egyptians and other
invasions. That unity reached its culmination with the formation
of a Seleucid Syrian state, which grew into a powerful empire
and dominated Asia Minor and extended as far as India.
Syria's
loss of sovereignty as a consequence of the major foreign
invasions resulted in its partition into arbitrary political
units. In the Perso-Byzantine period, the Byzantines extended
their rule over western Syria and applied the name Syria' to
that part only, while the Persians dominated the eastern part
which they called -irah', later arabicized as Iraq. Similarly,
after the First World War the codominium of Great Britain and
France over Syria resulted in the partition of the country
according to their political aims and interests and gave rise to
the present political designations: Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon,
Syria, Cilicia and Iraq. Natural Syria consists of all those
regions which constitute one geographic-economic-strategic unit.
The Syrian Social Nationalist cause will not be fulfilled unless
the unity of Syria is achieved.
The
partitioning of Syria between the Byzantines and the Persians
into Eastern and Western Syria and the creation of barriers
between them, retarded considerably, and for a long period, the
national growth and the development of the social and economic
life cycle of the country. This division resulted also in
distorting the truth about the boundaries of Syria. Additional
factors contributing to this distortion were: the incursion of
the desert upon the lower arch of the Fertile Crescent, the
decrease in population, the recession of urban areas (by virtue
of constant wars and invasions), and deforestation, all of which
made vast areas of the country desolate. The lack of reliable
studies pertaining to the cause of this ever increasing drought,
which has caused deepening of the arch, has contributed to the
view that the expansion of the desert has been a permanent
phenomenon. In my studies,I have demonstrated the indisputable
unity of the country and examined the arbitrary grounds for its
present condition and its partitioning, and established that all
the territory to which the term Mesopotamia refers, as far as
the Zagros mountains that form the natural boundary separating
Eastern Syria from Iran, falls within Syria-
The Syrian
homeland is an essential factor in Syrian nationalism. Every
Syrian Social Nationalist must be conversant with the boundaries
of his beautiful country and keep its picture before his mind.
In order to safeguard his right and the rights of his
descendants in this wonderful country, he should grasp well the
unity of his nation, the community of its rights, and the
indivisible unity of its country.
I have
indicated in Book One of The Genesis of Nations that the
dynamism and vitality of a nation may lead to alteration of its
natural boundaries. A strong and ever-growing nation will
transcend its frontiers and expand beyond them, whereas a weak
and weathering nation will shrink within those frontiers. After
the decline and fall of the great Syrian states, the whole
Syrian nation was reduced to impotence and recession. It lost
the Sinai peninsula to Egypt and Cilicia to Turkey, and shrank
within its own natural boundaries, and was finally broken up by
the powers which invaded and occupied its territory in whole or
in part.
The Syrian
Social Nationalist Party symbolizes the resurgence of the Syrian
nation, which is bent on recovering its power and vitality and
redeeming its dismembered parts.
The Syrian homeland has played a
major role in the shaping of the Syrian nation and its
character. The internal elements of the Syrian environment
provide means of interaction between the various regions.
Indeed, if one considers the waterways of Syria, its rivers and
streams, one can view the contribution of the physical
environment to the formation of one society. Considering that
the major part of the history of any human society revolved
until recently predominantly around agriculture,
the continuity of agricultural
space would inevitably invite lines of interaction between human
elements within the environment. The courses of the great Syrian
rivers, the
Euphrates and the Tigris, are
natural couriers of life between western and eastern Syria, and
between the northern and southern regions of eastern Syria. The
Orontes links the plains of central and northern regions of
western Syria while the Litani and Jordan rivers link the
central and southern parts. The Mediterranean littoral spreads
without interruption over fertile coastal lands from the gulf of
Alexandretta to the early shores of the Sinai peninsula.
These internal elements favoring
unity of life are paralleled by natural borders that define,
albeit relatively, the confines of the society forming herein.
The borders of the Syrian Fertile Crescent have limited the
extension of continuous life and thus shaped the formation of
the nation. These borders, however, were never exclusive. They
were in various historical periods overrun in both directions.
Syrian commercial colonies from the Assyrian periods have been
identified in Anatolia and from the Phoenician periods over much
of the Mediterranean. The military might of Assyria extended
beyond the Zagros and Taurus mountains to the north and east,
and over the Sinai into Egypt. Conversely, the Egyptians often
coveted the Syrian coast and the intrusions of the Pharaonic
state into western Syria were recurrent. The Gutians, the
Kassites, and the Persians crossed the eastern borders when the
military preparedness of eastern Syrian states faltered. The
Hiftites, the Greeks, the Romans and the Ottomans crossed the
northern borders. Despite those recurrent invasions, the life
cycle of Syria was never completely linked to that of invading
societies and the degree of interaction was limited by the lack
of territorial continuity of human settlement and life.
In delineating the western
borders of Syria, Saadeh mentions the "Syrian sea". This
terminology is not peculiar to the literature of the SSNP, but
has been utilized by European geographers and cartographers.
Indeed, a cursory perusal of ancient maps reveals the term to
have been used as early as the second century AD by Claudius
Ptolemy (Mare Siriacum)-. In the same map, Ptolemy utilizes the
term Syria for the western part of the Fertile Crescent in
accordance with Roman administrative division, whereas the
eastern part is divided into the two regions of Mesopotamia and
Babylonia. The practice was continued in Renaissance and
sixteenth century maps and Jacob Ziegler (1470-1549) uses the
term 'Mare Syriacum' in a map of the Holy Land. The term was
again used by Gerardus Mercator (1512-1594), the inventor of map
projection still used today, as a region of the Mediterranean
along the coast of the Holy Land and he extends Coele Syria
southward to the entire eastern bank of the Jordan. The German
cartographer Tilleman Stella (1525-1589) calls 'Mare Syrium
Phoenicium' the coast off Syrophoenicia (the coastal area lining
the Lebanon mountain chain), a practice followed by the Dutch
Abraham Ortelius (1527-1598) the publisher of the first world
atlas. In a map of the battle of Lepanto between the Ottoman and
Venetian fleets in 1571 off the coast of Greece, the Italian
Antonio Lafreri (1512-1577) calls the sea between Cyprus and the
Syrian coast 'Pelagus Sirum-Mare di Siria'. The practice was
continued by British, Dutch, German and French cartographers
until the middle of the 18 th century when one observes the use
of ' Grande Mer' and 'La Mer du Levant' replacing Syrian sea.
It is instructive to examine one
additional aspect of Saadeh's description of the Syrian
homeland, namely his interpretation of the reasons for the
distortion of the truth of the eastern expansion of the Syrian
homeland to include Mesopotamia. Saadeh hints at the theory of
progressive desiccation that has been entertained by some
scholars. He does give greater emphasis, however, to the
economic consequences of political and social changes. Modern
scholarship has confirmed his interpretation, and examples of
soil depletion and decline of agriculture as a sequel of
political changes abound.
|