|
This
principle signifies that all the legal and political
questions that relate to any portion of Syrian territory, or
to any Syrian group, are part of one indivisible cause
distinct from, and unmixed with, any other external matter
which may nullify the conception of the unity of Syrian
interests and of the Syrian will. This principle follows
from and is complementary to the first principle. Since
Syria is for the Syrians and the Syrians are a complete
nation endowed with the right to sovereignty, it follows
that this nation's cause, that is its life and destiny,
belongs to her alone and is independent from any other cause
that involves interests other than those of the Syrian
people.
This
principle reserves to the Syrians alone the right to expound
their own cause and to be their sole representatives,
determine their own interests and shape their own destiny.
From
the spiritual point of view, this principle entails that the
will of the Syrian nation, which represents its highest
interests, is a general will and that the lofty ideals that
the Syrians seek to realize emanate from their own
character, temperament and talents. The Syrian nation can
not tolerate the disintegration of these ideals, or its
dissociation from them or their mingling with other aims in
which they may be forfeited. These ideals are Freedom, Duty,
Discipline, and Strength, abounding with Truth, Good and
Beauty in the most sublime form to which the Syrian spirit
can rise and which the Syrians must attain through their own
endeavors, since no one else but themselves can represent or
realize those ideals for them.
In
accordance with this principle, the Syrian Social
Nationalist Party declares that it does not recognize the
right of any non-Syrian person or organization to speak on
behalf of Syria and its interests either in internal or
international matters. The Party does not recognize the
right of anybody to make the interests of Syria contingent
on the interests of other nations. The Syrian Social
Nationalist Party does not recognize the right of any
non-Syrian person or organization to thrust its own ideals
upon the Syrian nation in substitution for its own.
This principle details the
national reference frame expounded in the first principle.
While reasserting the national character of territorial
sovereignty, it relates all essential elements of the life
and destiny of the nation to a national decision framework.
The cause for this principle is the long held attitude
rampant among Syrians before the advent of the SSNP, that
the destiny of Syria is inextricably linked to the destiny
and will of the foreign colonial power in control. While
under Ottoman rule, many Syrian thinkers thought of the
destiny of Syria as part of the Ottoman empire and fought
for Ottoman nationalism. Even the early resistance to Jewish
settlements in southern Syria was formulated in the context
of loyalty to the Ottoman state. Subsequently, the
separatist Christian leaders in Lebanon sought to link the
destiny of central western Syria (Lebanon) to France. More
recently, the continuous conflict on Syrian land between
Syrians and Zionists is interpreted as a manifestation of
the struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union
for Near Eastern supremacy. By proclaiming the integral and
independent framework for the Syrian national cause, Saadeh
was establishing the guiding principle for the struggle of
the Party: the SSNP does not view the life and destiny of
Syria as related to any non-Syrian issues and thus the
pursuit of the interests of Syria by the Party is guided
solely by those principles independent of extraneous causes
or struggles.
This principle also
establishes the Unitarian direction in tackling the issues
of the life and destiny of the nation. Thus the occupation
of southern Syria by Zionists is not a 'Palestinian issue'
or a separate 'Palestinian cause', but part of the Syrian
cause. By establishing the wider appurtenance of the
Palestinian issue, Saadeh commits the entire Syrian nation
to the struggle for the return of Palestine to full Syrian
sovereignty. It is clear that abandonment of this principle
has been largely responsible for the defeat of the efforts
of Palestinians in keeping and recuperating southern Syria.
It is only with a unified Syrian effort that southern
Syria can be liberated.
An additional tangible
consequence of this principle is the realization that
Zionist colonialism is a threat to the entire of Syria as
has become clearly obvious in the events of recent history.
The national framework has allowed Saadeh to become
cognizant of the ramifications of Zionist settlements very
early in this century and to voice his warning starting in
1925 of the dangers of these settlements (10). The
assumption by the entire Syrian nation of the responsibility
for issues affecting some of its regions assures vigilance
in all national matters. The exemplification of this
principle lies in the thousands of SSNP members whose
struggle, sacrifices and martyrdom has transcended regional
affiliations.
The emphasis on the national
framework for the Syrian cause and its integral character
establishes a Unitarian streak in the struggle. It is a
guardian against regionalism, sectarianism and individualism
in attending to issues related to the life and destiny of
the nation. This extends also to the issue of
representation. This principle implies that regional
representatives can not claim absolute right of
representation for their regions in a manner to exclude the
rights of the nation as a whole to any decisions pertaining
to that region or its inhabitants. Thus the SSNP does not
accept that regional representatives are the 'sole legal
representatives of the people' as is common in the parlance
of various regional political groups. According to this
principle, the regions of Syria are so integrally related in
one unity that no regional decision with major envergure can
be made in isolation from the rest of the nation. Thus it is
not the right of the representatives of regional groups to
forfeit parts of the homeland, albeit the parts of that
region. Any proclamation of the acceptance by Palestinian
groups of the right of Israel to exist and the forfeiting of
Palestine is considered by the SSNP as treason to the cause
of the nation and the homeland (1). As it relates to
non-Syrians interceding on behalf of Syria, the SSNP does
not recognize the right of an Egyptian president to
represent Syrian interests and to come to agreement in any
forum with anybody over vital issues of Syrian appurtenance.
Thus agreements relating to the West Bank by an Egyptian
president and a US president in Camp David are considered
void by the Party on principle.
|